U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Florida's Sexually Violent Predator Program: An Examination of Risk and Civil Commitment Eligibility

NCJ Number
221198
Journal
Crime & Delinquency Volume: 54 Issue: 1 Dated: January 2008 Pages: 95-127
Author(s)
Karol Lucken; William Bales
Date Published
January 2008
Length
33 pages
Annotation
The study analyzed the first stage of a two-stage risk assessment process that determines whether eligible sex offenders are referred for clinical evaluation in Florida’s Sexually Violent Predator Program (SVPP).
Abstract
The finding indicate that despite considerable discretion given evaluators in assessing risk, substantial and salient group differences between those released and referred and that the primary factors informing referral decisions are consistent with legislative intent, actuarial instruments, and sex offender recidivism research. A critical component of civil commitment is the risk assessment process that determines recommendations for civil confinement once a prison term has expired. Proper application of sex offender civil commitment (SOCC) laws is achievable; risk assessment in Florida’s Sexually Violent Predator Program (SVPP) is not arbitrary, in that the factors that most determine a referral to clinical evaluation conform to legislative and scientific standards. Simple program statistics show that only 6.5 percent of the 5,931 sex offenders initially referred to the SVPP between July 2000 and August 2003 were referred for further clinical evaluation; subsequent to the clinical evaluation, even fewer were ultimately recommended for civil commitment. Moreover, of the 6.5 percent referred, all had the requisite prior diagnoses for sexual deviance disorders. These finding suggest that there is adherence to the legislative intent, that only a small number of sex offenders are to be targeted, and that they must have mental abnormalities that are directly related to their sexually violent behavior. The findings of the group differences and regression analyses provided a compelling case that risk assessments are scientifically informed as well. The categorization of sex offenders into those who appear most dangerous and those who do not should exhibit a substantial segregation on the basis of the salient risk factors; risk assessment performed by the SVPP evaluator met this standard. Study limitations and suggestions for further research are discussed. Tables, notes, references

Publication Format
Article
Publication Type
Report (Study/Research)
Language
English
Country
United States of America