U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Rehabilitation, Retribution and Restorative Justice: Alternative Conceptions of Juvenile Justice (From Restorative Juvenile Justice: Repairing the Harm of Youth Crime, P 17-44, 1999, Gordon Bazemore and Lode Walgrave, eds. -- See NCJ-181924)

NCJ Number
181925
Author(s)
Barry C. Feld
Date Published
1999
Length
28 pages
Annotation
This analysis of the juvenile court notes that it has changed from a social welfare agency into a deficient criminal court for juveniles; has inherent and irreconcilable contradictions in combining treatment and punishment, social welfare, and penal control; and needs to uncouple the two goals conceptually and administratively.
Abstract
The separation of social welfare from criminal social control leaves no role for a separate juvenile delinquency court. However, if States try all offenders in one integrated criminal court, they must formally recognize youthfulness as a mitigating factor when sentencing younger offenders. These issues regarding the failures of the rehabilitative juvenile court and the nature of an explicitly punitive response to youth crime provides a conceptual framework posed to proponents of restorative justice. These questions concern the nature of restorative justice and whether it is a program, an idea, a policy, a strategy, a conceptual framework, or a paradigm shift. The answers to these questions may indicate whether restorative justice represents an attempt to revive rehabilitation, a return to informal and discretionary coercive social control, a series of additions to current dispositions, a threat to a liberal democracy’s tenets of individual liberty and the rule of law, or an alternative conception of social control and a justice system. 102 references