NCJ Number
138071
Date Published
1990
Length
44 pages
Annotation
This chapter reviews the use and effectiveness of random breathtesting (RBT) and random stopping programs across Australia, using as a theoretical framework a model of the relationship between legal interventions and traffic offenses.
Abstract
Because RBT is a "pure" expression of the deterrence doctrine, a "causal chain" that depicts the deterrence process constitutes the heart of the model; however, the model provides more than an account of how legal interventions such as RBT may be translated in to behavioral change through fear of legal punishments. This chapter summarizes research which suggests that the impact of RBT on informal sanctions that operate in the drinking situations was a major element in its success in New South Wales. A review of the impact of RBT and roadblocks across Australia indicates that RBT as implemented is not uniformly successful; its effects depend on its manner of enforcement. RBT must be publicized and enforced in the manner used in New South Wales and Tasmania if it is to achieve maximum potential, that is, one breath test for every three licensed drivers each year, to yield a permanent reduction of approximately one-third in alcohol-related fatalities and serious injuries. Also, consistent with deterrence theory, evidence from two States indicates that those with a previous conviction for drunk driving are more responsive to the legal threat than those without previous experience of the law. 4 figures and 66 references