U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Insanity Defense and Presidential Peril (From Deviance in American Life, P 287-299, 1989, James M. Henslin, ed. -- See NCJ-124163)

NCJ Number
124175
Author(s)
D W Carrithers
Date Published
1989
Length
13 pages
Annotation
Congress has made substantial changes in the rules governing the defense that enables defendants to be judged not guilty by reason of insanity.
Abstract
This legislation addresses for the first time how the insanity defense should be used in federal insanity trials. A bill was proposed to allow claims of insanity to be raised only to rebut the prosecution's contention that a given defendant had the requisite mens rea, or culpable mind, required for conviction. Supporters of this reform praised it on the grounds that only those so insane they literally did not know what they were doing when they committed their crimes could be acquitted. However, Congress eventually abandoned the mens rea approach because it was considered too extreme a narrowing of the defense and might be difficult for the prosecution to prove. In future federal cases defendants will have to prove by "clear and convincing evidence" that they could not appreciate the wrongfulness of their conduct. If they are unable to do this, their insanity defenses will fail.