U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Forensic Pathology (From Scientific and Expert Evidence - Second Edition, P 1165-1203, 1981, Edward J Imwinkelried, ed. - See NCJ-88831)

NCJ Number
88850
Author(s)
R Bucklin
Date Published
1981
Length
39 pages
Annotation
Forensic pathology is concerned with identification of the deceased and the manner of death, whether by gunshot, blunt force, a sharp instrument, thermal or electrical force, asphyxiation, drowning, child abuse, or unexpected natural death. This review of forensic pathology gives attorneys basic background in the field and explains how it relates to the legal profession.
Abstract
The pathologist must base his/her opinions on concrete data derived from such practices as determination of the precise location of any bullet wound, microscopic studies of the wound, X-ray and fluoroscopic examination of the direction of a bullet through the body, and exact measurements of the length and depth of each wound. Standards used by pathologists to interpret data are objective and reliable in some cases, notably fingerprint identification and interpretive standards for identifying electrical burns. Under the microscope, the epidermis in a typical electric burn will be evaluated. Interpretive standards for other determinations, however, have their limitations. Age estimates from adult skeletal examinations are accurate only in a plus or minus 5-year range. Determining the age of a bruise is difficult because there is considerable individual variation in the way the skin reacts to injury. Similarly, not very much weight should be attached to a pathologist's description of a stabbing weapon if the opinion is based solely on wound dimensions. The stabbing compresses tissue and may produce a track wider and longer than the knife blade. Determining death by drowning is also difficult. The presence of diatoms do not constitute positive proof of drowning. Further, it is questionable whether an exact time-of-death determination can be made based on body heat loss. Not infrequently it is the pathologist who correlates the autopsy findings with multiple injuries and substantiates the diagnosis of child abuse. An example of a postmortem report is appended. (Publisher summary modified)

Downloads

No download available

Availability