NCJ Number
179850
Editor(s)
James D. Sewell
Date Published
1999
Length
262 pages
Annotation
This book presents opposing perspectives on controversial policing issues related to the following topics: the police and America's legal framework, police personnel practices, the police organization, and policing communities.
Abstract
In examining controversial issues under the topic of the police and America's legal framework, one of the chapters presents opposing views of how the Fourth Amendment, which protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures, impacts police work; the debated issue is whether court interpretations of the Fourth Amendment constitute an "inevitable evolution" or an "unfortunate devolution." The other issues debated under the topic of police and America's legal framework are whether civil forfeiture in law enforcement is an "effective tool" or "cash register justices;" whether a police officer's "bill of rights" is a needed protection for cops; and whether juvenile curfews are a legal and effective way to reduce juvenile crime. Regarding police personnel practices, the issues debated are whether a college degree should be required for the contemporary police officer, whether the time is now right for college-educated cops, and whether police executive contracts are a foundation for successful tenure. The controversial issues related to the police organization are whether ethical problems in policing are a function of poor organizational communications, whether it is time to change the police paramilitary structure, whether there is a distinct subculture in American policing, and whether it is time for police agencies to eliminate pursuits. Issues debated under the topic of policing our communities include whether we need a "war on crime" or "peace in the hood," whether community policing is a more effective police response or inflated promises, whether citizen review boards provide a needed oversight of police practices, and whether the media assist law enforcement. References accompany the position papers.