The primary purpose of the reported projects was to test a newer, largely untested, theory about when experiencing social rejection leads to antisocial behavior instead of prosocial or asocial responses.
The theory reviewed is Richman and Leary’s (2009) Multimotive Model, along with modifications made to this theory for the current project. As part of their synthesis of decades of research on social rejection, Richman and Leary identified three basic sets of behavioral responses to rejection: prosocial (e.g., seeking support, forgiveness, and mending bonds); asocial (e.g., social withdrawal, avoidance); or antisocial (e.g., aggression, retaliation). The model then proposes theoretical pathways to each of these types of behavioral outcomes. The model posits that the behavioral path chosen depends on how the individual “makes sense” of the rejection. The proposed revision to this model integrated new research on social alienation and perceived groupness. This report then describes the methodology used to test the validity of the Multimotive Model. This is followed by a review of test findings, advising that future testing of the Multimotive Model should focus on the group dynamics that affect individual responses to peer aggression, not just one-on-one dynamics. 3 figures, 1 table, and 14 references
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Research Review: Why do Prospective and Retrospective Measures of Maltreatment Differ? A Narrative Review
- Prevalence and Risk Factors of Depression in US Adults Post Mass Shootings: Evidence from Population-based Surveys of Multiple Communities
- Examining the Relationship Between Firearm Violence Exposure and Posttraumatic Symptomatology in Adolescents: A Scoping Review