U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR WITNESS GOES HAYWIRE: GETTING THE DIRECT EXAMINATION BACK ON TRACK

NCJ Number
142490
Journal
Trial Volume: 29 Issue: 5 Dated: (May 1993) Pages: 118-122
Author(s)
D H Williams
Date Published
1993
Length
5 pages
Annotation
Attorneys should deal with their witnesses who make unexpected statements in court by taking control in the form of asking direct questions and guiding the witness in accordance with Federal rules of evidence.
Abstract
Attorneys often lack the time to prepare every witness thoroughly; even when they do carefully prepare a witness, the witness may make statements the attorney has never heard before and refuse to repeat previous statements. Only thorough preparation and courtroom experience will give an attorney the confidence and presence of mind to handle such a witness. Therefore, the attorney should learn how to apply the Federal rules, which are intended to be read, interpreted, and applied in conjunction with each other, not individually. Attorneys can lead witnesses they are impeaching under the guise of refreshing their memory. They may ask leading questions generally where the witness is hostile, unwilling, or biased; where a child or adult witness has communication problems; where the witness has recollection problems; and when preliminary matters must be established. It is crucial to know when to obtain permission before asking leading questions and when to simply beg forgiveness after already leading. The attorney should also wave the theme of the case into the questions and use short, simple, pointed questions. They should also visualize their examination and recognize that the attorney's job is to be the leader throughout the testimony. 3 reference notes