NCJ Number
85257
Journal
Victimology Volume: 5 Issue: 2-4 Dated: (1980) Pages: 99-109
Date Published
1982
Length
11 pages
Annotation
A review of theoretical and clinical issues related to the issue of vengeance indicates that emphasizing vengeance or retribution in dealing with the offender is ultimately harmful to the victim.
Abstract
This applies at the societal, family, and individual level. Society's new emphasis on retribution is not spawned by concern for the victim but for the victimizer since concern shifts from private harm against an individual to harm against an institution. The just deserts doctrine is responsive to limited social needs and directly and indirectly leads to neglect of the victim. The long-range effect of victimization on the family is poorly understood. One variable, preoccupation with vengeance, appears to be most appropriate in the individual vicitimized. However, there are limits to the usefulnes of victims' retributive motivations. For example, the vengeance-oriented approach to family violence is particularly inappropriate when the process of victimization might be remedied by counseling. The victim's need to understand feelings of hate and helplessness must be distinguished from the victim's wish to seek vengeance. Eight references are included. (Author abstract modified)