U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Two Solitudes or Just One? -- Provincial Differences in Youth Court Judges and the Operation of Youth Courts

NCJ Number
194453
Journal
Canadian Journal of Criminology Volume: 44 Issue: 2 Dated: April 2002 Pages: 165-180
Author(s)
Jane B. Sprott; Anthony N. Doob
Date Published
April 2002
Length
16 pages
Annotation
This article examines provincial differences in youth court judges and the operation of youth courts in Canada.
Abstract
Quebec has a different approach to youth justice from that in the rest of Canada; the greatest difference appears to be in the rate of bringing cases into youth court. The article suggests that differences between Quebec and the rest of Canada are accounted for by the perceived adequacy of the administration of the Young Offenders Act and not by more basic differences in the penal philosophies of the two sets of judges. The article concludes that broad social policies having to do with support for children and policies having to do with institutions such as schools would be much more important in terms of their impact on crime than youth justice policies. Finally, if other provinces are interested in creating a youth justice system modeled on the Quebec system, the principles in the Youth Criminal Justice Act such as limiting the use of court and providing adequate community sanctions would be a good start. Figures, tables, notes, references