NCJ Number
75934
Date Published
1980
Length
7 pages
Annotation
This chapter from a book examining major administrative, interpersonal, and research issues related to sexually integrated prisons argues against the use of such institutions.
Abstract
To date, no evaluation has been conducted to provide definitive data on the impact of living in a cocorrectional institution. However, based on the author's experience with incarcerated female felons and on additional information, it is argued that coed prisons are not an appropriate means of reforming the behavior patterns of offenders. Because they make up such a small portion of the institutionalized population, female prisoners to be given last priority in the scheme of correctional planning and programming. The cocorrectional institution will destroy any existing separate programming for the female offender. Because women who are institutionalized have generally been exploited by men in their lives, the coed institution may well be the setting for a continuation of this experience. Even if exploitation is not a material fact, it will probably be evidenced in the male inmates' attitudes. The relationship of male loser and female loser creates an environment that tends to reinforce negative attitudes. Convicted females who are sent into confinement need a protracted period of time away from men for the purpose of discovering their own identities, responsibilities, and resources. Dependency and insecurity of the incarcerated female will only continue in the cocorrectional facility. The more relaxed atmosphere of women's prisons and programs allowing visitation with their children are vital factors in effecting positive changes. Such factors are not possible in the typical cocorrectional setting. No references are given.