NCJ Number
79218
Date Published
1980
Length
16 pages
Annotation
Decisionmaking uniformity and consistency are examined in the county attorney's office in Erie County, N.Y.
Abstract
Consistency is defined as the extent of agreement between the assistants and the policymaker, and uniformity is defined as the amount of agreement among the assistants independent of a comparison to the leader. The test, which was conducted on November 13, 1979, produced 71 responses (70 assistants and the first assistant) to each of the 30 cases in the standard case set. The distribution of the cases along the priority scale indicated that a full range of cases was presented, from lowest to highest priority, and the statistical tendency to normalize distributions at the average level was not violated. Both these conditions give credibility to the subsequent analysis. The decisionmaking outcomes examined were (1) the priority of the case for prosecution, (2) accepting a case for prosecution, (3) case disposed of by plea, (4) case reduced to a lesser charge, (5) disposition by trial, and (6) recommendation for incarceration. Analysis of the factors considered by the assistants in decisionmaking shows that the office staff is behaving in a rational and predictable manner and that the decisions are based on factors that are logically consistent and related. Findings on uniformity and consistency indicate that the assistants know the prosecutor's policy and the levels of uniformity and consistency in decisionmaking are almost equal. Background information is provided on the office's structure and operation, and tabular data are included.