NCJ Number
82200
Date Published
1981
Length
11 pages
Annotation
This publication discusses the traffic officer's role as a witness in court and methods of enhancing the effectiveness of testimony during direct examination and cross-examination.
Abstract
The ability to testify properly and a knowledge of courtroom deportment are necessary elements of being a traffic officer. Three kinds of court situations are encountered in traffic cases: the simple hearing, a magistrate without a jury, and jury trials. A magistrate without a jury is the usual way of handling cases in most cities except the smaller ones. Suggestions to follow to convince the judge or jury of the witnesses' veracity include dressing conservatively, speaking loudly and clearly so everyone can hear, and avoiding language the jury does not understand. Testimony must be given with honesty and accuracy. Events should be recounted in the order that they actually happened, and only that which is actually known by the officer should be presented according to the rules of evidence. Suggestions concerning how to behave and react to cross-examination tactics are given, (maintain composure, correct errors, etc.) and procedures to follow in a simple hearing are detailed. Advice is also offered on procedures and appropriate behavior to follow in traffic courts where cases are tried without a jury. Photographs and five references are included.