Toward a Refinement of Purpose in Comparative Criminological Research - Research Site Selection in Focus

• NCJ Number: 93068
• Journal: International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice Volume: 7 Issue: 1 Dated: (Spring 1983) Pages: 89-97
• Author(s): I H Marshall; C E Marshall
• Date Published: 1983
• Length: 9 pages
• Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/; NCJRS Photocopy Services
• Language: English
• Country: United States of America
• Note: An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 1978 Meeting of the American Society of Gerontology.

Annotation

This paper draws on a distinction between two purposes of comparative research: (1) testing the universality of a proposition (theory testing) and (2) specification of a proposition (theory construction).

Abstract

These two distinct activities have been inadvertently mixed in comparative criminology thereby causing a great deal of confusion. The present paper argues that attention by comparative researchers to this distinction between theory testing and theory construction will contribute to the resolution of one major methodological problem: that of research site selection. We suggest that in light of the distinction drawn, the testing of the universality of a proposition is most appropriately done in research comparing Western and non-Western nations ('dissimilar design'). But comparative research aimed at the specification of a proposition is best conducted by comparing Western nations ('similar design'). (Publisher abstract)