NCJ Number
168937
Journal
New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement Volume: 22 Issue: 2 Dated: (Spring 1996) Pages: 391-437
Date Published
1996
Length
47 pages
Annotation
This Note advocates that under all circumstances, imposition of the death penalty upon a juvenile is cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Abstract
Part II of this Note briefly discusses the history of the juvenile justice system. The goal of the juvenile justice system is to treat and rehabilitate juveniles, not to punish them. Part III discusses the death penalty in general and specifically how it pertains to juveniles. This section focuses on the two most recent U.S. Supreme Court cases: Thompson v. Oklahoma and Stanford v. Kentucky. Part IV discusses the constitutionality of the juvenile death penalty. In determining whether a punishment is cruel and unusual, and therefore unconstitutional, the U.S. Supreme Court has used a traditional three-part Eighth Amendment analysis. By using the Eighth Amendment framework, it must be concluded that the imposition of the death penalty upon a juvenile is cruel and unusual punishment. Part V discusses more effective alternatives in dealing with a violent juvenile offender rather than the imposition of the death penalty. First, society must get to the roots of juvenile delinquency and understand how these juveniles have come to commit such violent acts. Second, for any approach to be successful, it must proceed on two levels. The short-term solution is incarceration coupled with creative and innovative rehabilitation programs. The long-term solution is to rebuild and revitalize the American urban community. Any attempt to reduce juvenile crime must empower the juvenile, give him a sense of dignity and importance, and assist him in creating a meaningful future for himself. 339 footnotes