U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Terrorism and Terrorist Leaders: Insights From Developmental and Ecological Psychology

NCJ Number
222109
Journal
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism Volume: 31 Issue: 3 Dated: March 2008 Pages: 227-250
Author(s)
Alice Locicero; Samuel J. Sinclair
Date Published
March 2008
Length
24 pages
Annotation
This article describes a common pattern in cognitive complexity among terrorist leaders, using Osama bin Laden as a model.
Abstract
This article proposes a developmental psychological model of the conditions that favor terrorist actions which represent publicly discernible goals ascribed to a political religious cause. Entrenched cognitive simplicity in one key ideological domain (religious or political) is coupled with behavior reflecting the capacity for far greater complexity in other domains (organizational skills, planning problem-solving). Scholarship and theoretical explanations of terrorism have been in demand and have increased since the attacks of September 11, 2001. Using developmental and ecological dailies as a framework, one can create a dynamic model of the kinds of situations that allow communities to see the creation of terror and destruction as a necessary, defensible, and even prosocial activity. This model includes attention to the development of leaders, volunteers, communities of support, and the relationships between communities of support and society at large. The model seems to be a generally good fit for several areas were less powerful groups have engaged in non-state-sponsored terrorism: Spain's Basque area, Northern Ireland, Chechnya, and the Northeast (Tamil) area of Sri Lanka. In several of these conflict situations, one or more leaders of the less powerful group have shown developmental shifts toward the ability to manage increased complexity in leading, or considering, the actions of the group. However, progress in the area of managing a complex organization does not necessarily lead to progress in relation to considerations of political religious ideology. Ability and willingness to negotiate for the sake of peace requires higher levels in the area of ideology, as well as their area of organizational competence. Notes