U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Simon and Schuster and Content Neutrality: A Return to Doctrinal Normalcy?

NCJ Number
140772
Journal
Criminal Justice Journal Volume: 14 Issue: 2 Dated: (Fall 1992) Pages: 195- 228
Author(s)
B James
Date Published
1992
Length
34 pages
Annotation
In its decision in Simon and Schuster v. New York State Crime Victims Board, the U.S. Supreme Court reached a correct decision, but its brevity and Justice Blackmun's concurrence suggests that deeper, unresolved concerns underlie the Court's other recent decisions indicating a search for a new model of protection of freedom of speech.
Abstract
The Court ruled unconstitutional a New York State law that required that an accused or convicted criminal's income from works describing the crime be deposited in an escrow account for 5 years for the benefit of victims and creditors. The case reveals much about the competing theories of free speech within the Rehnquist Court. However, the case is difficult to explain when considered with prior models of permissible government regulation of expression. If the concerns expressed in Blackmun's concurrence are taken seriously, it is possible that the Court has completely confused the once-clear notion of a marketplace of ideas in which any regulation is neutral with respect to the content of the ideas. Instead, the court should clarify and elucidate the issues. Footnotes

Downloads

No download available

Availability