U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Relative Extent of Physical Punishment and Abuse By Mothers and Fathers

NCJ Number
181610
Journal
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse Volume: 1 Issue: 1 Dated: January 2000 Pages: 47-66
Author(s)
Gavin Nobes; Marjorie Smith
Editor(s)
Jon R. Conte
Date Published
2000
Length
20 pages
Annotation
The literature is reviewed on the extent to which mothers and fathers administer physical punishment and perpetrate physical abuse.
Abstract
Studies that use similar methods generally show fair agreement, but some significant inconsistencies occur when different sources of information are employed. There is general agreement that mothers and fathers physically punish their children to similar extents. The picture regarding severe or abusive actions is less clear. Most parental self-report studies indicate that mothers are at least as likely as fathers to be responsible. However, according to most studies based on victim reports and on official or clinical records that take father absence into account, fathers are more often implicated. Possible reasons for the research discrepancies include differences between definitions, sample biases, and inaccurate reporting. Despite the lack of agreement, the evidence shows that fathers are responsible for a considerable proportion of violence to children. Implications of the findings for practice, policy, and research are discussed. An appendix contains definitions of the form and extent of physical punishment and abuse. 85 references, 1 note, and 2 tables

Downloads

No download available

Availability