U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Refusing and Withdrawing from Forensic Evaluations

NCJ Number
241982
Journal
Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice Volume: 13 Issue: 1 Dated: January - February 2013 Pages: 14-26
Author(s)
Stanley L. Brodsky, Ph.D.; Jennifer Kelly Wilson, M.A.; Tess M. S. Neal, Ph.D.
Date Published
February 2013
Length
13 pages
Annotation
This study collected descriptive information about the reasons mental health experts decline or withdraw from forensic assessments, both early and late in the legal process.
Abstract
The current study collected descriptive information about the reasons mental health experts decline or withdraw from forensic assessments, both early and late in the legal process. In response to an online survey, 29 forensic psychologists and psychiatrists presented examples of case withdrawal from their professional experiences. Their major reasons included ethical issues or conflicts, payment difficulties, and interpersonal or procedural problems with retaining counsel or evaluees. Clearly, there are compelling personal and professional reasons that prompt forensic mental health experts to withdraw from or turn down cases. Abstract published by arrangement with Taylor and Francis.