NCJ Number
110446
Date Published
1987
Length
15 pages
Annotation
In reviewing Dutch research that compares the impact on inmates of treatment-oriented and custodially-oriented correctional facilities, this study focuses on the objective of prison policy, its history, and the issues it raises.
Abstract
Dutch prison policy since World War II has been dominated by the rehabilitative ideal, but institutions housing dangerous and problem inmates are custodially-oriented. The custodial institutions strictly regulate inmate-staff relations, maintain tight inmate discipline, and limit inmates' freedom. Treatment-oriented institutions, on the other hand, focus on inmates' problems and needs, frequent informal contacts between staff and inmates, and inmate freedom within the institution. Using recidivism as the criterion, however, Dutch research has found that treatment-oriented institutions do not have a greater rehabilitative effect than custodially-oriented institutions, controlling for inmate background characteristics. Given this finding, official penal policy has lowered the expectation of rehabilitation and given priority to the humane execution of the sentence while minimizing the negative impacts of imprisonment and offering programmatic opportunities for inmates to improve their abilities to live responsibly upon release. Recent studies have shown a relationship between the characteristics of a prison and the characteristics of inmate subcultures. Rigid prison regimes tend to foster violence, disorder, and drug use among inmates. Research is underway to explore this connection further. 40 references.