NCJ Number
102301
Date Published
1985
Length
366 pages
Annotation
Testimony before the House Subcommittee on Employment Opportunities considers H.R. 1524 and H.R. 1924, which would outlaw the use of the polygraph as an employment screening or evaluation device in nondefense private companies engaged in any business in or affecting interstate commerce.
Abstract
H.R. 1924 would impose fines on violators and allow aggrieved persons to seek civil action on their own behalf or through an employee organization. Supporters of these bills argue that the polygraph is unreliiable, violates the privacy rights of employees and potential employees, has potential for abuse, and has devastating consequences for those who fail tests. When queried about why H.R. 1924 exempts Federal employees and employees of companies having defense contracts, the bill's sponsor indicates this was a political concession to increase the chances the bill would pass. Representatives of polygrapher associations and security agencies argue that the polygraph is a useful security tool and is highly reliable when used by a properly trained and licensed examiner. Opponents of the bills favor State laws that will ensure examiners are properly licensed and employee rights are protected. Written statements and correspondence.