NCJ Number
86675
Journal
Sociological Inquiry Volume: 50 Issue: 1 Dated: (1980) Pages: 65-74
Date Published
1980
Length
10 pages
Annotation
Traditionally, deviance research and theory have focused almost exclusively on the personal attributes of the alleged deviant. This paper questions the appropriateness of such a focus when examining the organizational processing of criminal defendants.
Abstract
It directs attention to situational contingencies that provide the context within which personal attributes and behaviors become meaningful and salient during labeling and sanctioning. Discussion focuses on a strategic but often neglected contingency, conviction method. Empirical analysis reveals that the way in which the defendant was convicted has strong implications for the criteria officials use later to label and sanction the defendant. The implications of these findings for deviance research are then discussed. Tables, footnotes, and about 45 references are provided. (Author abstract modified)