U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

'Jar Wars' in the Workplace: The Constitutionality of Urinalysis Programs Designed To Eliminate Substance Abuse Among Federal Employees

NCJ Number
113121
Journal
Syracuse Law Review Volume: 38 Issue: 3 Dated: (1987) Pages: 937-964
Author(s)
R H Elliott
Date Published
1987
Length
28 pages
Annotation
President Reagan's 1986 Executive Order calls for each Federal agency to implement an employee drug testing program and provides procedural guidelines for such programs.
Abstract
Specifically, the Executive Order allows agencies to require testing when there is a reasonable suspicion of drug use. Mandatory random or uniform testing applies only to sensitive positions. Also covered are notification procedures, documentation of legitimate drug use, physical privacy during specimen collection, and appeal and adjudication procedures. With respect to right to privacy issues, virtually every judicial decision has held that acquiring a urine specimen constitutes a search for fourth amendment purposes. Consequently such testing must meet a reasonableness standard. In general, testing with reasonable suspicion, when it is voluntary or required for safety or security, or to monitor employee rehabilitation would not be considered unreasonable, intrusive, or arbitrary. Courts have been split about the constitutionality of random mandatory testing of persons in 'sensitive' positions. An examination of additional provisions suggests that the Executive Order provides sufficient procedures and safeguards to satisfy rudimentary due process standards and ensure the protection of individual substantive rights. The Executive Order will probably continue to come under judicial scrutiny, particularly in the area of mandatory random testing. 184 footnotes.