NCJ Number
159999
Date Published
1993
Length
14 pages
Annotation
This chapter introduces concepts related to the routine activity and rational choice approaches to criminology, and justifies the validity of theoretical cooperation between proponents of these two approaches.
Abstract
The routine activity theory, which first sought to explain direct-contact predatory violations, states three minimal elements for this type of crime, i.e., a likely offender, a suitable target, and the absence of a capable guardian against crime. The rational choice approach was developed in the context of situational crime prevention, which attempts to block opportunities for crime through environmental change. This chapter compares and contrasts the two approaches in general terms, reviews other related criminological theories, and discusses the extent to which these two theories should seek to coexist with traditional theory, or seek to replace it. 1 table and 31 references