U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Institutional Assessment and Classification of Female Offenders: From Robust Beauty to Person-Centered Assessment (From Female Offenders: Critical Perspectives and Effective Interventions, Second Edition, P 283-322, 2008, Ruth T. Zaplin, ed. -- See NCJ-225923)

NCJ Number
225932
Author(s)
Tim Brennan
Date Published
2008
Length
40 pages
Annotation
This chapter reviews several problems and offers some suggestions for advances in assessing and classifying female offenders.
Abstract
The status of assessment of women in correctional institutions remains problematic. It reflects many design flaws, weak validation, calibrations based on male samples, and use of gender-neutral factors while other potentially important factors are ignored. Improving assessment and classification for women offenders might proceed on several fronts. The first is technical design and the elimination of design flaws. The second is improved organizational implementation. The latter problem draws attention to an implementation gap that should be minimized. Suggestions are offered to advance methods and policy for assessing female offenders in correctional institutions. Current institutional assessments reflect various design flaws that are particularly damaging to the effective and fair assessment of women. Along with inadequate resources and ineffective implementation, current institutional assessments have undermined some basic correctional goals. Institutional classifications embody the policies of the institutions in which they are implemented. However, most offender classification systems were designed to meet a set of purposes and policies of primary relevance to male prisoners. The author suggests that validated theories of female offenders’ criminality to guide selection of gender-specific assessment factors are urgently needed and that the need to improve classification systems for females remains a critical issue. Figure and references