NCJ Number
17753
Date Published
1974
Length
0 pages
Annotation
THIS FILM USES A MOCK COMPETENCY HEARING TO ILLUSTRATE THEORETICAL POINTS OF LAW IN REGARD TO COMPETENCY HEARINGS AND TO DISTINGUISH THEM FROM INSANITY HEARINGS.
Abstract
CONFRONTATION BETWEEN SNIPER AND POLICE SWAT TEAM (SPECIAL WEAPONS ASSAULT) LEADS TO APPREHENSION AND ARREST. PRIOR TO TRIAL, PROSECUTOR REQUESTS HEARING TO DETERMINE COMPETENCY OF DEFENDANT TO STAND TRIAL. FILM INCLUDES DISCUSSION OF WHY PROSECUTOR RAISES THE ISSUE. KEY ISSUE IS WHETHER DEFENDANT IS CAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING CHARGES AND ASSISTING IN HIS DEFENSE. PROSECUTOR USES EXPERT WITNESS TO SHOW ACUTE SCHIZOID DIAGNOSIS. VARIOUS FORMS OF INCOMPETENCY PROCEEDINGS ARE DISCUSSED. DEFENSE PROBES AMOUNT OF TIME PSYCHIATRIST DEVOTED TO HIS EXAMINATIONS; ABILITY OF DEFENDANT TO UNDERSTAND CHARGES EVEN THOUGH HE MAY BE CLINICALLY INSANE; PROSECUTOR CLARIFIES TECHNICAL POINTS ON REDIRECT AND JUDGE DECLARES DEFENDANT INCOMPETENT. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT)