NCJ Number
107769
Date Published
1987
Length
349 pages
Annotation
Using a comparative analysis of the differing philosophies and management of the prison systems of California, Michigan, and Texas, this volume argues that prisons that are ruled as constitutional governments can be safe and humane, despite overcrowding, budget limitations, and racial polarization.
Abstract
The analysis used data from observations and discussions with correctional administrators, guards, and inmates; reviews of prison records and procedures; study of political, legal, and budgetary disputes related to the prisons; and examination of variations in management styles. The author argues that prison management is the crucial factor in enabling a prison to control as well as rehabilitate prisoners. The analysis shows that prison managers can choose an administrative path between the violent rule of inmate predators and the arbitrary rule of autocratic wardens. It discusses how highly disciplined prison authorities can control inmates while controlling themselves. It also suggests ways for judges, legislators, correctional workers, and others to act to reduce both serious prison disorders and recidivism and to increase meaningful treatment programs. Data tables, chapter notes, index, and annotated list of 65 references. (Publisher summary modified)