Gendered Violence and Safety: A Contextual Approach to Improving Security in Women's Facilities: Part III of III: Measuring Gendered Violence and Safety: Research Design and Methods

• NCJ Number: 225341
• Author(s): Barbara Owen Ph.D.; James Wells Ph.D.; Joycelyn Pollock Ph.D., J.D.; Bernadette Muscat Ph.D.; Stephanie Torres M.S.
• Date Published: November 2008
• Length: 185 pages
• Grant Number(s): 2006-RP-BX-0016
• Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
• Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
• Publication Format: Document
• Language: English
• Country: United States of America
• Note: Reference NCJ 225338 for complete report, NCJ 225339-40 for Parts I and II, and NCJ 225342 and 225343 for related bulletins.

Annotation

This third part of a three-part report on a project that investigated the context of gendered violence and safety in women’s correctional facilities discusses the development of a series of instruments designed to measure the social climate and context of inmate housing units.

Abstract

The project produced a battery of multidimensional instruments with questionnaire items and response categories designed to capture accurately women’s experiences in correctional facilities. Based upon all empirical assessments conducted on the psychometric properties of the 11 instruments, there is strong evidence that these instruments are valid and reliable measures of various aspects of violence and safety in women’s correctional facilities; however, this does not mean that all of the instruments are ready for administering to future inmate populations. This is a “first wave” attempt to show that valid and reliable tools can be developed to measure issues that pertain to safety and violence in women’s correctional facilities. These tools can and should be refined and improved before they are ready for future use. Two of the instruments measured “Problems in the Housing Units Involving Inmates” and “Problems in the Housing Unit Involving Staff.” Three instruments measured the “Likelihood of Violence,” “Personal Awareness of Policies and Procedures Related to Safety and Violence,” and “Reporting Climate.” The remaining instruments measured factors leading to violence, specifically inmate sexual violence, inmate physical violence, staff verbal harassment, staff sexual harassment, staff sexual misconduct, and staff physical violence. 49 tables, 11 references, and 8 appendixes with supplementary information