NCJ Number
108138
Journal
Journal of Gambling Behavior Volume: 2 Issue: 1 Dated: (Spring/Summer 1986) Pages: 50-57
Date Published
1986
Length
8 pages
Annotation
This paper focuses on the two basic types of confidence schemes designed for gambling swindles and examines some of the reasons why people become involved in confidence schemes.
Abstract
Con men working together seek out potential victims, based on their character and 'investment' potential. The big con schemes involve considerable planning and time in order to beat a carefully selected, wealthy victim, sometimes in a simulated casino setting. In contrast, the short con scheme may be carried out by a 'team' or 'mob' using a suburban street corner or operating at a traveling carnival. Rigged (gaffed) game equipment may be used along with a well-rehearsed story or pitch by the operators. Victims of these schemes are often prominent and successful doctors, attorneys, and business people. Most become involved through the psychology used by con artists to trap prospective victims. Players may feel that their ability to succeed in other areas will bring success in this area. They are unaware that the scam may be rigged. They are also attracted by the lure of winning big with little risk. Their egos, the enjoyment of new friendships, and the desire to do something nice for their children or a friend are additional factors. They often do not report swindles to avoid notoriety and shame or because of guilty feelings. Sometimes they are unaware that they are victims. In addition, most victims do not want to admit that they are victims. 5 references. (Author abstract modified)