U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Excuses, Excuses: Self-Handicapping in an Australian Adolescent Sample

NCJ Number
206879
Journal
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Volume: 33 Issue: 4 Dated: August 2004 Pages: 271-281
Author(s)
Suzanne Warner; Susan Moore
Date Published
August 2004
Length
11 pages
Annotation
This Australian study examined gender differences in the self-handicapping tendencies of a sample of 337 adolescents between the ages of 15 and 19.
Abstract
"Self-handicapping" has been described by Jones and Berglas (1978) as the creation of obstacles or disadvantages that make success on a task more difficult. They proposed that when faced with an important evaluation, many individuals create an impediment to performance to protect their self-esteem, rather than meeting the challenge of doing their best. The strategy is considered to be mostly unconscious, and it is typically operative when a person doubts his/her capabilities. For the sample used in the current study, self-handicapping was measured with the shortened Self-Handicapping Scale, which contains 14 items that measure tendencies to use self-handicapping strategies such as illness, procrastination, emotional upsets, and lack of effort. Self-handicapping was examined in relation to self-esteem, performance attributions, coping strategies, and the potential behavioral self-handicaps of reduced study hours and inefficient study habits. The data analysis found that girls scored significantly higher on the Self-Handicapping Scale and tended to use emotion-related and illness-related excuses significantly more often than boys. High self-handicapping scores independently predicted lower study hours for boys and were associated with less efficient study for girls. For boys, the coping and attributional predictors of self-handicapping were rumination, luck attribution, and poor active coping strategies; for girls, they were ability attributions, behavioral disengagement, instrumental support, and poor active coping strategies. This study concludes that the habitual use of a self-handicapping strategy when challenged to demonstrate ability places youth in a cycle of chronic underachievement, bringing lowered self-esteem and well-being with it. Self-focused rumination in particular is an emotion-focused strategy associated with dysphoria and depression. Suggestions are offered for interventions in school settings that can assist in countering self-handicapping attitudes and behaviors. 3 tables and 31 references