NCJ Number
206059
Date Published
2004
Length
17 pages
Annotation
This report presents the results of a process evaluation of the “Duluth Domestic Violence” program, currently operating under the name of the Integrated Domestic Abuse Programme in the United Kingdom.
Abstract
In 1980, the Duluth project got off the ground in Duluth, MN, as a comprehensive, community-based initiative designed to intervene in domestic violence cases. The initiative was marked by a coordinated, interagency response to violence that included a 24-week court-ordered non-violence program for offenders and support groups for victims. The program was modeled in the United Kingdom and was originally referred to as the Duluth Domestic Violence Programme. In 2001 a process and outcome evaluation of the Duluth Domestic Violence Programme was commissioned; this report presents the results of the process evaluation, which assessed the nature of program delivery and management. Evaluation methodology involved approximately 30 face-to-face interviews with staff from two probation areas and other related agencies. Staff were questioned concerning staffing levels, experience, training, accommodation, internal and external communication, program material, delivery style and techniques, dosage and intensity of program, duration of program, and compliance with monitoring and integrity procedures. Staff from the National Probation Directorate was also interviewed regarding the management of program implementation. The process evaluation results revealed that staffing issues, especially involving recruitment and retention, are one of the main areas of concern. Staff levels were not even across the pilot program areas and program delivery staff reported differing experiences with the program training process. Communication among staff was flagged as a concern, as were issues involving the nature of information sharing and data confidentiality. The creation of formal protocols regarding the roles and responsibilities of staff and information sharing between teams are encouraged to assist with the continuation of program delivery. The collection and analysis of data regarding the program is also encouraged as such data contributes to the continued development of effective offender programs. Several other conclusions and recommendations are outlined and fall in the areas of successful implementation, staff training, communication, program delivery, and strategic program implementation issues.