U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Discipline of Difference: Ethnolinguistic Heterogeneity and Corporal Punishment

NCJ Number
International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice Volume: 36 Issue: 3 Dated: August 2012 Pages: 211-228
Matthew Pate; Laurie A. Gould
Date Published
August 2012
18 pages
The goal of this study is to refind the current body of social explanations for the use of corporal punishment as a state-sanction punishment against criminal offenders using a cross-national perspective.
The minority threat hypothesis contends that growth in the size of a given minority population along with the ensuing competition for social and political resources will threaten existing social power arrangements. Regarding punishment specifically, the hypothesis states that dominant groups will support coercive measures to keep minority populations sufficiently oppressed. Using the minority threat hypothesis as the theoretical foundation, the authors posit that the more heterogeneous a population, the more social control will be necessary to maintain societal equilibrium for those in power. In effect a more personal, physical, and visceral response to criminal behavior will be deemed necessary in countries with high levels of fractionalization. This more focused form of social discipline will manifest as corporal punishment. Comparing modalities of punishment against varying population characteristics, the authors find that countries with higher levels of ethnic, linguistic, and religious fractionalization are more likely to employ corporal punishment against criminal offenders. Abstract published by arrangement with Taylor and Francis.