Dilemmas of Correctional Law and Rehabilitation (From National Workshop on Corrections and Parole Administration, Second - Proceedings, P 57-74 See NCJ-85059)

• NCJ Number: 85066
• Author(s): R W Friedman
• Date Published: 1974
• Length: 18 pages
• Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
• Language: English
• Country: United States of America
• Note: Available on microfiche as NCJ-85059

Annotation

In the midst of the failure of rehabilitation programs and lawsuits charging inhumane treatment of inmates, the justice model, which requires the correctional system to treat those under its jurisdiction in a lawful manner, is the most appropriate model for correctional reform.

Abstract

There are numerous conflicts and dilemmas in correctional law and rehabilitation. Statutes defining objectives for corrections are often vague, overgeneralized, and inconsistent. Correctional agencies rarely define their objectives, and performance standards are almost nonexistent. The courts have been asked to resolve many problems regarding administrative discretion and the constitutionality of correctional practices. There is still considerable doubt about the 'law' of corrections. The justice model of rehabilitation for corrections holds promise as a standard for progress. The justice model applied within institutions can provide an example for offenders in how to treat persons humanely and with respect. Through the Mutual Agreement Program, whereby inmates select and agree to rehabilitation objectives according to a timetable that provides release upon the completion of the objectives, corrections has begun to recognize the need for joint planning for change. Ten bibliographic entries are provided. (Author summary modified)