Differentiating Parents with Faking-Good Profiles From Parents with Valid Scores on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory

• NCJ Number: 247508
• Journal: Journal of Family Violence Volume: 29 Issue: 1 Dated: January 2014 Pages: 79-88
• Author(s): Amanda H. Costello; Cheryl B. McNeil
• Date Published: January 2014
• Length: 10 pages
• Publication Format: Article
• Publication Type: Report (Study/Research)
• Language: English
• Country: United States of America

Annotation

The present study examined differences between physically abusive parents with a faking or non-faking profile on the CAP by demographic information, psychopathology, behavioral observation data, and abuse recidivism.

Abstract

Parental capacity assessments (PCAs) remain common during child abuse investigations, and "best practice" approaches to evaluations consist of using a comprehensive assessment (Budd et al. 2011). The Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAP; Milner 1986) is one risk assessment measure used during PCAs, but results may be confounded by faking-good behavior. Currently, there is a small amount of literature examining the characteristics and implications of parents who fake good on the CAP. The present study examined differences between physically abusive parents with a faking or non-faking profile on the CAP by demographic information, psychopathology, behavioral observation data, and abuse recidivism. Parents differed significantly by IQ and depression scores, but no significant differences were found on any other variable including recidivism rates at posttreatment. Implications of study outcomes, and the emphasis for a multimethod approach to PCAs will be discussed. Abstract published by arrangement with Springer.