U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

DETERRENCE - THEORY VERSUS PRACTICE

NCJ Number
47884
Journal
Criminology Volume: 16 Issue: 1 Dated: (MAY 1978) Pages: 3 -22
Author(s)
H N PONTELL
Date Published
1978
Length
20 pages
Annotation
THE POSSIBILITY THAT INCREASES IN CRIME OVERBURDEN LEGAL MACHINERY AND CAUSE DECREASES IN THE CERTAINTY OF PUNISHMENT IS SUGGESTED AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE HYPOTHESIS THAT PENAL SANCTIONS DETER CRIME.
Abstract
SOME RESEARCHERS HAVE FOCUSED ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CERTAINTY AND SEVERITY OF PUNISHMENT AND SUBSEQUENT RATES OF CRIME. FINDING AN INVERSE RELATIONSHIP, THESE RESEARCHERS CONCLUDE THAT PENAL SANCTIONS DETER CRIME. THERE ARE TWO REASONS TO QUESTION THIS INTERPRETATION: (1) BY CONCENTRATING EXCLUSIVELY ON PENAL SANCTIONS AS DETERMINANTS OF CRIME, THE RESEARCHERS HAVE NEGLECTED OTHER FACTORS (UNEMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL CLASS, ETC.) KNOWN TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE CRIME RATE; AND (2) NO ATTENTION HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE POSSIBLE EFFECTS THAT CRIME RATES MAY HAVE ON THE SANCTIONING ACTIVITIES OF PENAL AND JUDICIAL SYSTEMS. THE SAME DATA USED IN PAST DETERRENCE STUDIES ARE ANALYZED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT CRIME MAY AFFECT CERTAINTY OF PUNISHMENT MORE STRONGLY THAN CERTAINTY OF PUNISHMENT AFFECTS THE RATE OF CRIME. THIS 'SYSTEM CAPACITY' PERSPECTIVE BRINGS INTO QUESTION THE ABILITY OF LEGAL THREATS, AS ADMINISTERED IN THE UNITED STATE, TO DETER CRIME. SUPPORTING DATA, DETAILS OF ANALYSIS, AND A LIST OF REFERENCES ARE INCLUDED. FOR RESPONSES TO THIS ARTICLE, SEE NCJ 47885-47887. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT MODIFIED--LKM)

Downloads

No download available

Availability