U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Degrees of Estrangement: The Cultural Theory of Risk and Comparative Penology

NCJ Number
188781
Journal
Theoretical Criminology Volume: 5 Issue: 2 Dated: May 2001 Pages: 159-176
Author(s)
Richard Sparks
Editor(s)
Lynn Chancer, Tony Jefferson
Date Published
May 2001
Length
18 pages
Annotation
This article explored the question of how the penal realm or the risk-based practice intersects with the cultural and the political structures.
Abstract
This study compared and contrasted previous studies on how risk-based practice intersect with other structuring principles of penal systems and penal politics. For the penal system, risk refers primarily to the likelihood of re-offending by those already convicted. The study began by exploring the meaning of the terms penal culture and penal politics. Then, proceeded with a discussion on comparative analysis within the penal realm and within the contemporary scene. The notion of risk mobilized by the body of work known as “the new penology” is then compared with the one proposed in cultural theory. In summation, where a program of study is initiated that considers the location of the penal system within the variety of political outlooks you must also embark on the reconnection of penal research with normative moral and political reflection. Punishment is seen as a political manner. To contest certain current conceptions of punishment, it is necessary to point out the frailties of their evidentiary claims to effectiveness and show through comparative analysis the political rationalities and strategies that generate the relations implied between offender, state and community. References

Downloads

No download available

Availability