U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Cutting the Grass: A Reexamination of the Link Between Marital Attachment, Delinquent Peers and Desistance From Marijuana Use

NCJ Number
209646
Journal
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Volume: 21 Issue: 1 Dated: March 2005 Pages: 27-53
Author(s)
Michael O. Maume; Graham C. Ousey; Kevin Beaver
Date Published
2005
Length
28 pages
Annotation
This study re-examined the relationship between marital attachment, delinquent peer association, and desistance from marijuana use.
Abstract
Previous research has indicated that marriage contributes to desistance from crime. Two theories have been offered to explain this effect. This first, grounded in informal control theory, suggests that the marriage effect is a direct result of social bonds that tend to accompany marriage; the second contends that the effect is indirect and due to the impact of marriage on patterns of delinquent peer association. Using data from waves 5 and 6 of the National Youth Survey (NYS), this study re-examined the relationship between marriage, delinquent peer association, and desistance from marijuana use to determine which interpretation best explained the marriage effect. The data were divided into two samples: the total sample of individuals surveyed in waves 5 and 6 of the NYS (n=1,494), and the filtered sample of marijuana users who were single at the time of the wave 5 data collection (n=552). Using logistic regression analysis, the study found that while change in delinquent peer association was a powerful predictor of marijuana desistance, findings were also consistent with the control theory interpretation of the marriage effect. These findings highlight the need for additional longitudinal studies of desistance that examine variables derived from both control and differential association theories. Study limitations are also discussed. References, tables, appendix