U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Crack Cocaine and Cocaine Hydrochloride: Are the Differences Myth or Reality?

NCJ Number
165464
Journal
Journal of the American Medical Association Volume: 276 Issue: 19 Dated: (November 20, 1996) Pages: 1580-1588
Author(s)
D K Hatsukami; M W Fischman
Date Published
1996
Length
9 pages
Annotation
Similarities and differences between the use of crack cocaine and powdered cocaine were examined, with emphasis on policy implications related to the imprisonment and treatment of cocaine users.
Abstract
The analysis was based on a review of the literature in MEDLINE between 1976 and 1996 and further searches of individual articles that compared different routes of cocaine administration or types of cocaine. Results revealed a greater chance of abuse or addiction and more severe consequences when cocaine is smoked (cocaine base) or injected intravenously (cocaine hydrochloride) compared with intranasal use (cocaine hydrochloride). The crucial variables appear to be the immediacy, duration, and magnitude of cocaine's effect, as well as the frequency and amount of cocaine used, rather than the form of the cocaine. In addition, cocaine hydrochloride used intranasally may be a gateway drug or behavior to using crack cocaine. Findings indicate that the Federal sentencing guidelines allowing possession of 100 times more powdered cocaine than crack cocaine to trigger mandatory minimum penalties is excessive. Finally, many crimes committed by crack users are associated with addiction; addicts who are incarcerated for the sale or possession of cocaine are better served by treatment than prison. 85 references (Author abstract modified)

Downloads

No download available

Availability