NCJ Number
80337
Date Published
1978
Length
8 pages
Annotation
The current status of court computer systems and future directions are discussed.
Abstract
The evaluation literature and experience suggest that the evolution of court computer systems has reached a watershed. The first efforts have been completed, and feedback is now being received. Much money has been spent, with mixed results. There are many technically sophisticated, yet managerially ineffective, court computer systems operating today. Reasons for the ineffective implementation of court computer systems include (1) a diffusion of management authority and responsibility, (2) lack of a mechanism to remove poorly functioning portions of court computer systems, (3) lack of explicit goals and evaluation criteria, and (4) a proclivity among court executives to opt for the most modern hardware and software rather than the most cost-effective computer system. There is no doubt that computer systems are suited to assist court operations. Sound guidelines are needed, however, if court computer systems are to be cost-effective. Guidelines are offered for those contemplating or using a court computer system: accountability should be provided for all aspects of the system, provision should be made for adding to or deleting from the system with ease, explicit goals and evaluation criteria for the system should be set, the system should be cost-effective, and the system should be responsive to court demands for management information. Figures show a simplified cost-benefit comparison of processing options and a recommended approach to the court's participation in a comprehensive data system. Ten recommended readings and 15 notes are listed.