NCJ Number
133538
Date Published
1992
Length
9 pages
Annotation
The psychiatrist conducting a clinical evaluation for the juvenile court should approach the task as an investigation, recognizing the potentially serious impact of this psychological evaluation on the youth's life.
Abstract
Mental health professionals will encounter a wide range of ages and situations and should consider the limitations of their training, interests, and comfort in assessing various age groups. To overcome problems of bias, confidentiality, and maintenance of the patient-therapist alliance, the court evaluator should not be someone who has had an ongoing therapeutic relationship with the child or family. The psychiatrist should also not assume that individuals are telling the truth. They must clearly explain their role, the purpose of the evaluation, and the lack of confidentiality to each person being interviewed. The evaluation techniques should match the type of evaluation: delinquency and status offense evaluations, child abuse and neglect cases, and competency to stand trial. 7 references