NCJ Number
81217
Date Published
1981
Length
52 pages
Annotation
This case study of the Improved Correctional Field Services Project (ICFS), a project developed to test the effectiveness of using risk-screening procedures to assign probationers to different supervision levels, describes the preimplementation history.
Abstract
The preimplementation history examined covers about 5 years (1974-1978). It shows some of the pitfalls that may confront a program developer and evaluator. Some of the issues addressed are (1) whether the sources of social innovation and action are important determinants of program success; (2) the effect, if any, when there are different sources of action and innovation, as when the Federal Government originates and funds State and local projects; (3) whether encountering obstacles and problems alters, if only to some degree, the ultimate nature of a program; and (4) the implications for planning and evaluation if a program develops in a dynamic, adaptive way. After receiving funds in 1978, the three participating probation agencies undertook action to implement what was primarily an external solution to an externally defined problem. The nature of ICFS as it moved through its various phases did change dramatically. Because of the policy decision not to require a control or comparison situation, there was little chance of determining whether risk assessment and differential supervision influenced probation outcomes in ways different from and better than normal or regular probation. The following conclusions for research and action planning are presented: (1) the initial planning and development of test programs of the type discussed should occur in a single agency or unit; (2) a closer collaboration among the thinkers, the doers, and the critics must be achieved; and (3) pilot feasibility studies as part of the planning have much to recommend them. Twenty-four notes are provided. For other reports in the series, see NCJ 81216 and NCJ 81218-24.