NCJ Number
182936
Journal
Corrections Management Quarterly Volume: 4 Issue: 2 Dated: Spring 2000 Pages: 9-16
Date Published
2000
Length
8 pages
Annotation
This article discusses the importance of corrections policymakers' (e.g., judges, parole board members, and corrections administrators) developing and manifesting professional knowledge, skills, and values that provide publicly relevant outcomes.
Abstract
The rational approach to corrections presented in this article calls for a foundational paradigm shift in some critical areas: decisions related to staffing, focus on results, and commitment to policy development grounded in sound research. Without such a shift, training efforts and other forms of short-term technical assistance will at best offer a quick fix that cannot be sustained. Many applications of community policing/probation programs, restitution programs, community service, and the conflation of performance with results measures are excellent illustrations of the piecemeal adoption of programs that are most effective when their conceptual frameworks are not weakened by fragmented implementation. The three largest professional associations associated with corrections routinely devote considerable time and effort -- through conferences, technical assistance, and training -- to enhance the public safety value of correctional programs. The efforts of these professional associations to reduce piecemeal and misguided program implementation would be significantly advanced if they were met by professionals, especially those occupying key policy making positions, who had the knowledge, skills, and values to understand and embrace effective policies and programs. Even a small percentage of policymakers ill-equipped with knowledge, skills, and values can dramatically impede professional progress. Ten recommendations are offered for the development and maintenance of an ideal criminal justice system. 12 references