NCJ Number
11447
Date Published
1972
Length
514 pages
Annotation
EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF PRETRIAL RELEASE IN THE UNITED STATES, EXAMINING THE TRADITIONAL BAIL SYSTEM AND BAIL REFORM PROJECTS.
Abstract
ON THE BASIS OF INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED IN ELEVEN LARGE CITIES, THE FIRST SECTION OF THE DISSERTATION DESCRIBES THE FACILITIES, PROCEDURES, AND PERSONNEL INVOLVED IN THE TRADITIONAL BAIL SYSTEM. PART TWO DISCUSSES VARIOUS BAIL REFORM PROJECTS AND IDENTIFIES KEY OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS CONTRIBUTING TO PROJECT EFFECTIVENESS. THE FINAL SECTION, BASED ON A NATIONAL MAILED SURVEY, EXAMINES NATIONAL TRENDS AND ATTITUDES TOWARD PRETRIAL RELEASE. INCLUDED ARE RELEASE, DETENTION, FORFEITURE, AND REARREST RATES, COMPUTED FOR BOTH TRADITIONAL AND REFORM PROGRAMS. THIS STUDY FOUND THAT INCREASED NUMBERS OF DEFENDANTS COULD BE RELEASED PRIOR TO THEIR TRIAL ON THEIR OWN RECOGNIZANCE WITHOUT A RISE IN FORFEITURE OR CRIME RATES. THE ONLY DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLE WHICH WAS STATISTICALLY RELATED TO THE OPERATION OF A BAIL SYSTEM WAS A CITY'S POPULATION. THE ATTITUDINAL STUDY DISCLOSED THAT THE LARGE MAJORITY OF RESPONDANTS, WHO RECOGNIZED THAT THE TRADITIONAL SYSTEM OF BAIL WAS INEFFECTIVE, WERE UNABLE TO AGREE ON WHAT TYPES OF MODIFICATIONS AND REFORMS WERE NECESSARY. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT)