U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Analytical and Aggregation Biases in Analysis of Imprisonment: Reconciling Discrepancies in Studies of Racial Disparity

NCJ Number
148467
Journal
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency Volume: 31 Issue: 2 Dated: (May 1994) Pages: 166-182
Author(s)
R D Crutchfield; G S Bridges; S R Pitchford
Date Published
1994
Length
17 pages
Annotation
This article explores some of the methodological problems in previous research on racial disparities in imprisonment.
Abstract
Previous studies have frequently focused on single decisionmaking points in the criminal justice process, usually sentencing; focused on single jurisdictions; or used inappropriately aggregated jurisdictions. In this study, State-level data were collected on race-specific trends in imprisonment and arrests for violent crimes. Analysis revealed a great variation in racial patterns of imprisonment across the U.S. The complexity of this variation must be incorporated into research designs through the choice of appropriate levels of aggregation and through consideration of the substantial differences in criminal processing that exist across jurisdictions. These results support the argument that social contexts influence how courts and law enforcement agencies impose criminal sanctions. Future research should focus on identifying social and demographic conditions likely to promote racial inequality in punishment. 3 tables, 5 notes, and 19 references

Downloads

No download available

Availability