NCJ Number
123604
Date Published
1989
Length
11 pages
Annotation
Given the gravity of the threat of AIDS to public health on the one hand and the need to protect individual freedoms on the other hand, the AIDS dilemma involves a contest between potentially conflicting social and personal values.
Abstract
Of the nine AIDS countermeasures discussed in the chapter, the first four -- firing employees with AIDS, banning infected students, mandatory screening in the military, and the selective screening of employees -- are unwarranted on epidemiological as well as on psychosocial grounds. Another countermeasure -- life and health insurance discrimination aimed at excluding single males from coverage on the presumption they may fall into a primary risk group -- commits the fallacy of reasoning from "some" to "all." Such a policy violates the insurance industry's public duty to provide all clients with the opportunity for sound coverage as determined by a fair, medically informed, and evenly applied actuarial standard. The remaining countermeasures discussed -- closing bath houses, criminal prosecution, quarantine, and prenatal counseling -- are eligible for possible adoption under the harm principle, but not without serious qualification. 31 notes.