U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Adjudication of Child Sexual Abuse Cases

NCJ Number
162240
Journal
Future of Children Volume: 4 Issue: 2 Dated: (Summer-Fall 1994) Pages: 84- 101
Author(s)
J E B Myers
Date Published
1994
Length
18 pages
Annotation
The adjudication of child sexual abuse cases is examined, with emphasis on the importance of coordination among the criminal, juvenile, and divorce courts in which child sexual abuse litigation occurs and of appropriate procedures for children who must testify.
Abstract
Although most children have the cognitive and moral capacity to be competent witnesses, competence is not the same as believability. The developmental constraints of young children often requires suggestive questions; the need for suggestive questions is the central dilemma experienced by interviewers. Interviews that are done poorly undermine the ability to protect children and suggest false allegations, whereas interviews that are done well help children reveal their memories. Facing the defendant is the most difficult aspect of testifying for most children. Judges in both criminal and civil litigation have the authority to protect children from harassment and intimidation. Most children cope with testifying; with proper preparation and support, some children are empowered by testifying. However, few cases end in trials. Cases are sometimes under way in two or more courts simultaneously, so coordination among courts is essential. 107 references (Author abstract modified)