U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Abolicionizem: Paradoks Nekriminoloske Kriminologije? (Abolitionism: A Paradox of Non-criminological Criminology?)

NCJ Number
188671
Journal
Revija za Kriminalistiko in Kriminologijo Volume: 51 Issue: 4 Dated: July-September 2000 Pages: 295-304
Author(s)
Zoran Kanduc
Date Published
July 2000
Length
10 pages
Annotation
This paper focuses on the concept of abolitionism and argues that various conceptual and practical orientations covered by the overall concept of neo-abolitionism can be defined as the most consistent form of deconstructivism in criminology.
Abstract
Abolitionism does not comprise only a kaleidoscopic multitude of radically critical perspectives of contemporary criminal law systems; it also offers a range of alternative methods of solving interpersonal conflicts and responding to harmful events. Many abolitionist ideas have proved useful, especially in the area of critical criminology. Furthermore, the ideal of restorative justice now has a place in substantive and procedural criminal law. Thus, one function of abolitionist non-criminology is to operate as a sort of bad conscience regarding crime policy, which is based mostly on a criminal law response to social conflicts. Abolitionist perspectives often derive from simplified sociological and sociopsychological and explanations of the social role of the criminal law system. Nevertheless, abolitionism makes possible useful insights into different forms of violence; the classical criminal law vocabulary cannot conceptualize these areas. The future potential of abolitionism lies in this area. 36 references (Author abstract modified)

Downloads

No download available

Availability