This research set out to identify and establish potential error rates associated with tool mark analysis of cut marks in costal cartilage. Three knives with different blade types were used to make experimental cut marks in costal cartilage of pigs. Each cut surface was cast and each cast was examined by three analysts working independently and employing the generally accepted method of tool mark analysis of cut marks in costal cartilage. The presence of striations, regularity of striations, and identification of primary and secondary striation patterns were recorded for each cast. The distance between each striation was measured. The results showed that striations were not consistently impressed on the cut surface by the blade's cutting edge, and blade type classification by presence or absence of striations led to a 65% misclassification rate. The use of the classification tree and cross validation methods and inclusion of the mean interstriation distance decreased the error rate to approximately 50%.
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Development of a spectral X-ray fluorescence database to strengthen the scientific foundations for the forensic analysis and interpretation of modern soda-lime glass
- Predicting thermal response of gypsum board under various heat flux Configurations: A three-dimensional mathematical model
- Assessing automated image analysis and compound-specific stable isotope signatures for small arms propellant differentiation and potential brand identification