NCJ Number
172836
Date Published
December 1998
Length
29 pages
Annotation
This report delineates the distinctions among discretionary, mandatory and presumptive waivers of juveniles into adult criminal court.
Abstract
From 1992 through 1995, 40 States and the District of Columbia passed laws making it easier for juveniles to be tried as adults. To better understand the growing trend and the potential impact on youth crime, this paper examines the nature of offenses that trigger such transfers and various mechanisms used to effect them. The paper discusses direct file provisions, which typically authorize the prosecutor to determine jurisdiction based on age/offense categories, and statutory exclusions, which remove certain offenses or age/offense categories from the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. In addition, the report covers "once an adult/always an adult" provisions; transfer for nonviolent offenses; requirements for additional pretransfer findings; evidentiary standards for waivers and transfers; transfer treatment based on an individual's record; devices to limit prosecutorial discretion; and minimum age provisions. Notes, tables, appendix
Date Published: December 1, 1998
Similar Publications
- Juvenile Probation Officer Decision-Making in a Reforming State: Assessing the Application of Evidence Based Principles
- Facets of emotion dysregulation as mediators of the association between trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress symptoms in justice-involved adolescents.
- Another Way Out: The Impact of Juvenile Arrests on High School Dropout