This community court primarily hears neighborhood misdemeanor cases and some low-level felony cases. The court aims to combine punishment and service by linking offenders to visible community restitution projects, so they make a positive contribution to the neighborhood they have harmed with their criminal behavior. The court also links offenders to social service interventions and job training designed to better prepare them for constructive employment and social interactions. Community surveys before the community court was launched and for extended periods after it had been operating showed that residents had moved from a negative to a more positive view of the criminal justice system. This case study is used as an example of how perceptions and experiences of justice are formed at the neighborhood level where residents experience first hand how their lives have changed because their neighborhoods and the people with whom they interact have changed. Berman argues that in times when resources and funding are tight, priority should be given to research investments that lead to cost-effective improvements in quality of life at the neighborhood level.
Watch
Similar Publications
- Criminal Justice Interventions for Offenders With Mental Illness: Evaluation of Mental Health Courts in Bronx and Brooklyn, New York, Executive Summary
- Prison Versus Probation in California - Implications for Crime and Offender Recidivism
- Family Structure and Secondary Exposure to Violence in the Context of Varying Neighborhood Risks and Resources